70.笹川智子・金井嘉宏・村中泰子・鈴木伸一・嶋田洋徳・坂野雄二(2004).他者からの否定的評価に対する社会的不安測定尺度(FNE)短縮版作成の試み:項目反応理論による検討 行動療法研究,30(2),87-98.
71.金井嘉宏・笹川智子・陳峻文・鈴木伸一・嶋田洋徳・坂野雄二(2004).Social Phobia Scale と Social Interaction Anxiety Scale 日本語版の開発 心身医学,44(11),841-850.
72.五十嵐友里・嶋田洋徳(2005).社会的場面における解釈バイアス:ビデオ課題による解釈バイアスの測定 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,4(1),3-14.
73.小野久美子・植田健太・佐藤千鶴子・嶋田洋徳(2005).賭博行動の維持における認知的バイアスの検討 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,4(1),57-67.
74.高橋史・赤松亜紀・五十嵐友里・金子久美・佐藤千鶴子・嶋田洋徳(2005).児童・青年の反社会的行動とその心理社会的要因 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,4(1),89-97.
75.植田健太・境泉洋・佐藤寛・石川信一・中村光・嶋田洋徳・坂野雄二(2005).ひきこもりセルフヘルプグループにおける親のストレス反応低減効果の検討 ストレスマネジメント研究,2(1),55-60.
76.小関俊祐・嶋田洋徳・佐々木和義(2005).ソーシャル・サポートの提供者に対する認知的評価がストレス反応と課題遂行に及ぼす影響 発達心理臨床研究,11(1),63-72.
77.小野久美子・嶋田洋徳(2005).女子高校生における摂食障害傾向に影響を及ぼす要因の検討 心身医学,45(7),511-520.
78.Ono, K., Ueda, K., Takahashi, F., Igarashi, Y., Kaneko, K., Akamatsu, A., & Shimada, H.(2005).Development of the questionnaire for subjective satisfaction about stress coping and the influence of subjective satisfaction about stress coping on stress responses.Japanese Health Psychology,12(1),1-13.
79.Ono, K., & Shimada, H.(2005).Effects of social comparison and motivation on task-specific self-efficacy. Japanese Health Psychology,12(1),15-25.
80.川瀬英理・小野久美子・金子久美・長尾賢治・嶋田洋徳(2006).ストレスマネジメントプログラム実施のための指導者用解説書の開発 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,5(1),53-64.
81.能野淳子・永瀬英司・嶋田洋徳(2006).ラットにおけるオペラント反応の文脈変化による再出現:ABA復元効果およびAAB復元効果 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,5(1),99-109.
82.田上明日香・坂野雄二・嶋田洋徳(2006).青年期の神経性食欲不振症における時代および地域差の検討 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,5(1),111-118.
83.三輪温子・飯田綾・小倉容子・田上明日香・長尾賢治・能野淳子・野崎健太郎・嶋田洋徳(2006).成人の注意欠陥/多動性障害に対する認知行動論的介入の有用性についての展望 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,5(1),119-131.
84.佐藤千鶴子・今井正司・嶋田洋徳(2006).注意トレーニングの理論的背景と臨床的応用 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,5(1), 133-141.
85.佐藤寛・嶋田洋徳(2006).児童のネガティブな自動思考とポジティブな自動思考が抑うつ症状と不安症状に及ぼす影響 行動療法研究,32(1),1-13.
86.佐藤寛・高橋史・松尾雅・境泉洋・嶋田洋徳・陳峻文・貝谷久宣・坂野雄二(2006).Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised(SPSI-R)日本語版の作成と信頼性・妥当性の検討 行動療法研究,32(1),15-30.
87.佐藤寛・嶋田洋徳(2006).児童の抑うつに対する認知行動療法の研究動向 行動療法研究,32(1),31-44.
88.中村光・岩永可奈子・境泉洋・下津咲絵・井上敦子・植田健太・嶋田洋徳・坂野雄二・金沢吉展(2006).ひきこもり状態にある人を持つ家族の受療行動の実態 こころの健康,21(2),26-34.
89.姫野弥栄奈・大澤ちひろ・高橋史・嶋田洋徳(2007).シャイネスを示す大学生における社会的スキルの自己評定と他者評定による差異 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,6(1),47-56.
90.飯田綾・野崎健太郎・川崎雅子・嶋田洋徳・菅野純(2007).不登校児童生徒を対象とした宿泊体験学習が精神的健康に及ぼす影響:対人関係ゲームを用いたかかわり 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,6(1),66-77.
91.野村和孝・三輪温子・五十嵐友里・嶋田洋徳(2007).社会不安傾向者の安全確保行動と自己注目との関係 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,6(1),111-121.
92.笹川智子・高橋史・佐藤寛・赤松亜紀・嶋田洋徳・野村忍(2007).親の役割行動が児童青年期の社会不安に及ぼす効果 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,6(1),123-132.
93.田上明日香・水島秀聡・高橋史・嶋田洋徳(2007).キャリア研究の歴史と現状:理論・測定・介入の視点から 早稲田大学臨床心理学研究,6(1),167-178.
94.五十嵐友里・木下克久・嶋田洋徳(2007).社会的場面における解釈バイアスが状態不安に与える影響 早稲田大学人間科学研究,20(1),1-20.
95.小関俊祐・嶋田洋徳・佐々木和義(2007).対人不安傾向者に対するソーシャル・サポートのストレス低減効果 発達心理臨床研究,12(1),33-42.
96.佐藤寛・高橋史・杉山恵一・境泉洋・嶋田洋徳(2007).攻撃行動尺度の作成と信頼性・妥当性の検討 行動療法研究,33(1),33-44.
97.小関俊祐・嶋田洋徳・佐々木和義(2007).小学5年生に対する認知行動的アプローチによる抑うつの低減効果の検討 行動療法研究,33(1),45-57.

自己開示尺度の作成とその健康心理学的意義
Development of Self-Disclosure Scale and its implications in health psychology


嶋田洋徳(新潟大学人文学部)・佐藤健二(早稲田大学人間科学部)
Hironori SHIMADA (Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University), & Kenji SATO (School of Human Sciences, Waseda University)

人文科学研究(新潟大学人文学部),101,17-34.(1999)
Studies in Humanities(Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University)

The purposes of this study were to develop a new scale for measuring individual tendency of self-disclosure and to validate it. Subjects were 1,035 undergraduate students (626 males and 409 females). As a result of factor analysis, four factors were extracted: personal life values (Factor I), family and daily life (Factor II), heterosexual interpersonal relationship (Factor III), and small talk (Factor IV). It was also revealed that the new Self-Disclosure Scale has enough high reliability and validity. A comparison of gender difference revealed that female subjects showed high tendency to disclose their experiences related to items which were included in factor I and II than male subjects. It was also revealed that male subjects showed high tendency to disclose their experiences related to heterosexual interpersonal relationship. Results and clinical implications of this study were discussed from the health psychological viewpoints.

Key Words: Self-Disclosure Scale, health psychology, factor analysis, reliability, validity.



日本版 Muller Anger Coping Questionnaire(MAQ)の作成と妥当性・信頼性の検討
Development of the Japanese version of the Muller Anger Coping Questionnaire (MAQ)


大竹恵子(神戸女学院大学大学院人間科学研究科)・島井哲志(神戸女学院大学人間科学部)・曽我祥子(兵庫医科大学)・宇津木成介(神戸大学国際文化学部)・山崎勝之(鳴門教育大学)・大芦治(千葉大学教育学部)・坂井明子(美作女子大学)・西信雄(宝塚市立健康センター)・松島由美子(神戸女学院大学大学院人間科学研究科)・嶋田洋徳(新潟大学人文学部)・安藤明人(武庫川女子大学文学部)

Keiko OTAKE (Graduate School of Human Sciences, Kobe College), Satoshi SHIMAI (Department of Human Sciences, School of Human Sciences, Kobe College), Sachiko SOGA (Department of Psychology, Hyogo College of Medicine), Narisuke UTSUKI (Faculty of Cross-Cultural Studies, Kobe University), Katsuyuki YAMASAKI (Department of Human Development, Naruto University of Education), Osamu OASHI (Department of Educational Psychology, Chiba University), Akiko SAKAI (Department of Child Science, Faculty of Domestic Science, Mimasaka Women's College), Nobuo NISHI (Takaraduka City Health Promotion Center), Yumiko MATSUSHIMA (Graduate School of Human Sciences, Kobe College), Hironori SHIMADA (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University), & Akihito ANDO (Department of Human Relations, School of Letters, Mukogawa Women's University)

感情心理学研究(日本感情心理学会),7,13-24.(2000)
The Japanese Journal of Research on Emotions(Japan Society for Research on Emotions)

The purposes of this study were to develop a Japanese version of the Muller Anger Coping Questionnaire (MAQ), and to examine its validity and reliability. Participants, 1262 undergraduate students (617 male, 645 female), were asked to complete the translated questionnaires. Factor analysis revealed four components of anger coping: Aggressivitat, Kontrollierter Affekt, Schuld, and Soziale Hemmung. Evidence for factorial validity, criterion-related validity, and external validity for three of the sub-scales was also obtained. Scale reliability was measured using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was confirmed in a 16-week time frame. Results of these analyses offered evidence as to the reliability of the sub-scales. Further research concerning the relationship between AHA (Anger, Hostility, and Aggression) and health is suggested.

Key Words: Muller Anger Coping Scale (MAQ), Japanese version, standardization, undergraduate students.



テストへの対処行動の継時的変化とストレス状態との関連
Changes over Time of Coping Behavior and Stress Responses


鈴木伸一(岡山県立大学社会福祉学部)・嶋田洋徳(新潟大学人文学部)・坂野雄二(早稲田大学人間科学部)

Shin-ichi SUZUKI (Faculty of Health and Welfare Science, Okayama Prefectural University), Hironori SHIMADA (Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University), & Yuji SAKANO (School of Human Sciences, Waseda Universuty)

心理学研究(日本心理学会),72,290-297.(2001)
The Japanese Journal of Psychology(The Japanese Psychological Association)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between coping behavior and stress response of undergraduates as they experienced over time prior to an examination. One hundred forty eight undergraduates were asked to complete a set of questionnaires on coping behavior and stress response at a month (T1), a week (T2), and immediately (T3) prior to an important examination. Cluster analysis showed that there were four clusters of coping behavior at each period of time. Regardless of their effort level, students with high distress showed higher stress score than those with low distress. In hierarchical regression analysis of stress response change, an interaction effect of effort change and distress change over T1 to T2 was significant. Stress responses lessened for sutudents whose effort scores increased and distress scores decreased. The opposite was true for those whose effort score decreased but distress scores increased. From T2 to T3, a main effect of distress was significant. For students whose stress response increased, distress score also increased.

Key Words: changes over time, stress, coping, examination stress.



心理学的ストレスとソーシャルサポート
Psychological Stress and Social Support


嶋田洋徳(新潟大学人文学部)

Hironori SHIMADA (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University)

ストレス科学(日本ストレス学会),16,40-50.(2001)

A lot of studies have been achieved on the effects of social support on psychological stress or health of mind and body. Empirical studies on social support and psychological stress are in great progress. It was also the fact, however, conceptual and methodological confusion is found among recent studies on the relationship between social support and psychological stress. The purposes of this article were to review the research on social support mainly in Japan, and to analyze the recent trend of research on social support. A review was conducted from the viewpoints of i) conceptual definition, ii) measurement scales, iii) intervention studies, and iv) methodological issues of social support studies. First, concerning the definition of social support, Cobb's definition that put emphasis on the informational aspect and House's definition that emphasize the aspect of function were available. Second, since Hisata et al. developed "The Scale of Expectancy for Social Support: SESS" in 1989, many scales to measure social support have been developed in Japan (for children, for youths, for adults, for elderly, and so on). Most of these scales were based on an approach of perceived social support. Third, interventions for individuals or groups according to perceived social support or enacted social support suggested by Barrera were effective. Especially, it was revealed that perceived support coordinate with "Stress Appraisal Model" proposed by Lazarus & Folkman. Fourth, a comparison between direct effect and buffering effect was examined in social support studies. Conceptual and methodological confusion was also investigated (support resources, areas, types, dependence, and so on). Then, an effectiveness of social support was reconfirmed as a moderate variable in psychological stress. Finally, the significance of measuring social support in psychological stress studies and possibilities of clinical application were discussed.

Key Words: social support, psychological stress, stress responses, measurements, buffering effect.



中学生の喫煙意図と保護者の喫煙行動,養育態度の関係
The Relationship between Smoking Intension of Junior High School Students and Smoking Behavior and the Attitude of Bringing up in Their Parents


大竹恵子(神戸女学院大学大学院人間科学研究科)・島井哲志(神戸女学院大学人間科学部)・嶋田洋徳(新潟大学人文学部)

Keiko OTAKE (Graduate School of Human Sciences, Kobe College), Satoshi SHIMAI (Department of Human Sciences, School of Human Sciences, Kobe College), & Hironori SHIMADA (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Niigata University)

学校保健研究(日本学校保健学会),43,426-434.(2001)

The present study was to investigate the relationship between somoking intention of junior high school students and smoking behavior and the attitude of bringing up in their parents. The participants were 641 junior high school students (332 boys and 309 girls) and their parents who responded to our quetionnaire. The results showed that students who had smoking intention felt the merit of smoking behavior. The students who had smoking intention had interested in other risk behaviors. Furthermore, the parents who did not smoke strongly opposed the smoking behavior of their children in the future than parents who smoke. Finally, the parents whose children had smokig intention showed the high scores of control and strict attitude of bringing than the parents whose children had not smoking intenton. These results suggested that parents whose smoking behavior and the attitude of bringing up had relation to smoking intention of their children in junior high school students. It is suggested that the smoking prevention and intervention not only for children but also parents are important issues for the future research in Japanese junior high school students.

Key Words: junior high school students, parents, smoking intention, the attitude of bringing up.